Introduction
In the world of pump-action shotguns, the Mossberg name is synonymous with reliability, versatility, and a legacy of performance. The Mossberg 500 series, in particular, has become a staple in homes, hunting blinds, and law enforcement agencies across the globe. However, within this renowned lineage, the 500, 590, and 590A1 models stand out as distinct contenders, each designed with specific applications and user needs in mind. This comprehensive comparison delves into the intricacies of these three shotguns, examining their construction, features, strengths, weaknesses, and the ideal user for each. Our goal is to provide you with the knowledge needed to make an informed decision when choosing the right Mossberg for your requirements.
The Foundation: The Mossberg 500
The Mossberg 500 represents the cornerstone of the series, a pump-action shotgun that has rightfully earned its reputation for its dependability and adaptability. Its widespread popularity stems from a blend of factors: a straightforward design, relative affordability, and a modularity that allows for customization.
Design and Features
At its heart, the 500 operates on a straightforward pump-action system, employing a dual-action bar design for smooth cycling. The receiver is primarily constructed from aluminum, which keeps the weight manageable. This material choice, while contributing to the 500’s lighter feel, is one of the notable differences we’ll see in the later models. The 500 offers a wide array of configurations. Barrel lengths vary, enabling users to select the optimal configuration for their intended use. Magazine tube capacities also differ, providing further flexibility. The stock options range from basic wood or synthetic designs to pistol grip configurations, allowing users to tailor the shotgun to their preferred shooting style.
Key Features
Key features of the Mossberg 500 contribute to its appeal. The ambidextrous safety positioned on the top of the receiver is easy to manipulate, providing safe and convenient operation for both right and left-handed shooters. The affordability of the 500 is a major draw for many buyers, making it an accessible choice for both new and experienced shooters. A robust aftermarket support network provides a vast selection of parts, accessories, and customization options, allowing users to enhance their shotguns to suit specific needs and preferences.
Strengths
The strengths of the Mossberg 500 are numerous. Reliability is a hallmark of this platform. The 500 is renowned for its ability to function dependably, even under challenging conditions. The simplicity of its design contributes to its ease of maintenance; cleaning and troubleshooting are typically straightforward. The versatility of the 500 is another significant advantage. It can be readily adapted for hunting, home defense, and sport shooting, making it a practical choice for a wide range of users. The value proposition is compelling, offering a capable shotgun at a relatively affordable price point.
Weaknesses
While the Mossberg 500 possesses many strengths, it also has areas where it’s eclipsed by its siblings. The aluminum receiver, while contributing to its weight advantage, is not as inherently durable as the steel receivers found in the 590 and 590A1. This doesn’t mean it’s fragile, but it might not withstand the constant, hard use that its counterparts are built for. The 500 might lack some of the features deemed essential by users seeking a tactical or heavy-duty platform.
The Tactical Upgrade: The Mossberg 590
Stepping up in capability, we encounter the Mossberg 590. Designed as a more robust and purpose-built platform, the 590 builds upon the solid foundation of the 500, incorporating enhancements geared towards demanding applications.
Design and Features
The design of the 590 emphasizes durability and tactical features. Its receiver is constructed from steel, a material that provides greater strength and resistance to wear and tear. The 590 typically features an extended magazine tube, increasing its ammunition capacity. One of the key differences separating the 590 from the 500 is the design of the magazine tube cap; the 590 has a removable cap that can facilitate barrel changes. These are the hallmarks of a shotgun engineered for rigorous use and a variety of operational scenarios. The 590 also incorporates other tactical-oriented features, such as a sling swivel studs to allow for easy attachment of a sling.
Strengths
The strengths of the 590 are undeniable. Its increased durability is a major advantage. The steel receiver ensures that the 590 can withstand the rigors of intensive use, making it a preferred choice for professionals and individuals seeking a reliable platform. The higher magazine capacity provides an important edge in tactical and self-defense scenarios, allowing users to engage targets for extended periods. Its inclusion of tactical features caters directly to the needs of those seeking a home defense or law enforcement-oriented shotgun.
Weaknesses
Of course, there are a few trade-offs to consider. The 590 is generally heavier than the 500, primarily due to the steel receiver and other features. The added weight, although beneficial for durability, can affect maneuverability. Also, the 590 typically carries a higher price tag than the 500, a reflection of its enhanced construction and features.
The Military-Grade Beast: The Mossberg 590A1
The Mossberg 590A1 represents the pinnacle of the Mossberg shotgun lineage, a variant built to meet stringent military specifications. Its construction prioritizes uncompromising durability and reliability, making it the ideal choice for the most demanding situations.
Design and Features
The design of the 590A1 is characterized by its extreme ruggedness. It boasts a heavier barrel, which contributes to its increased resistance to wear and tear. The trigger guard and safety are often constructed from metal, enhancing their resilience. The 590A1 adheres to military standards (MIL-SPEC) for performance, reliability, and durability. This ensures that the shotgun can withstand the harshest conditions and deliver consistent performance when it matters most. The 590A1’s role is primarily found within military and law enforcement agencies, where its robust design and unwavering reliability are paramount.
Strengths
The strengths of the 590A1 are the most pronounced in this comparison. Its extreme durability is a key advantage, and the heavier barrel, steel receiver, and metal components ensure that the 590A1 can endure extensive use. It offers superior resistance to the elements, accidental damage, and wear, giving users confidence in its ability to perform. The 590A1 also boasts enhanced features suited for tactical purposes.
Weaknesses
There are considerations, of course. The 590A1 commands the highest price among the three models. This premium price reflects its more robust construction, military-grade components, and rigorous testing. It’s also the heaviest shotgun in the series, a factor that could influence its usability for some individuals. The 590A1 might be overkill for users who don’t require its level of ruggedness.
Key Differences: A Detailed Comparison
Delving deeper, let’s compare the core differences.
Receiver Materials
The choice of receiver material—aluminum in the 500 versus steel in the 590 and 590A1—has a direct impact on the shotgun’s durability and weight. The steel receivers of the 590 and 590A1 provide greater structural integrity, resulting in more rugged platforms.
Magazine Tube Design
The magazine tube design varies between the 500 and the 590/590A1. The 590 typically features a removable magazine tube cap, which allows for easier barrel changes and maintenance.
Barrel Construction
The barrel construction also contributes to the differences. The 590A1’s heavier-walled barrel is designed to withstand extreme stress and heat, reflecting the shotgun’s intended use in demanding environments.
Metal Trigger Guard and Safety
The metal trigger guard and safety found in the 590A1 reflect the shotgun’s military-grade design, enhancing durability and promoting operational efficiency.
Capacity Differences
Capacity differences reflect differing needs. The 500 provides a sufficient magazine capacity for a variety of applications. The 590 and 590A1, however, often feature extended magazine tubes, maximizing ammunition capacity.
User Experience
User experience also varies between these three shotguns. The 500 is generally regarded as easy to handle. The 590, with its increased weight and tactical features, offers a different feel. The 590A1 is engineered for ruggedness; its heavier weight and robust construction are intended to maximize its operational longevity.
Which Shotgun is Right for You?
Selecting the right shotgun requires a careful assessment of your needs and preferences. Here’s a breakdown:
If your primary interest is hunting, sport shooting, or casual home defense and your budget is a concern, the Mossberg 500 is likely the best choice. It provides exceptional value, reliability, and versatility.
For home defense or scenarios requiring a more durable and tactical platform, the Mossberg 590 offers an excellent balance of features, durability, and performance.
If you are looking for an extremely rugged shotgun suitable for the most demanding applications, the Mossberg 590A1 is the ultimate choice.
Conclusion
The Mossberg 500, 590, and 590A1 all contribute in significant ways to the legacy of the Mossberg shotgun platform. The Mossberg 500 shines as a versatile, affordable option. The Mossberg 590 offers an upgrade for those seeking enhanced durability and tactical features. The Mossberg 590A1, engineered to military standards, embodies the ultimate in ruggedness and reliability.
The ideal choice depends entirely on the individual user’s specific needs. We encourage you to research and handle these shotguns before making your purchase.
The Mossberg shotgun platform’s enduring popularity is a testament to its performance, and reliability.
This article has hopefully provided you with a comprehensive understanding of the Mossberg 500, 590, and 590A1. Whether you are a first-time buyer or a seasoned shooter, we trust that you have found this comparison to be both informative and helpful.
Call to Action
We encourage you to share your thoughts and experiences in the comments.
Browse related articles.
Find more information.
