The Glock 17: A Pioneer in Polymer
The world of handguns is a crowded one, filled with a vast array of options designed for everything from personal defense and recreational shooting to professional use. Within this landscape, a few names consistently rise to the top, earning reputations for reliability, performance, and widespread adoption. Among these titans, the Glock 17 and the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 stand out as particularly popular and well-regarded choices. Both have cemented their place in the firearms community, each attracting a dedicated following and dominating a significant portion of the market. But which one is truly the better handgun? That’s the question we aim to answer. This article will delve into a comprehensive comparison of these two firearms, examining their features, performance characteristics, and suitability for different users, ultimately helping you determine which might be the right choice for your needs. Whether you’re a seasoned shooter or just starting your journey into the world of handguns, understanding the nuances of these two models is crucial to making an informed decision.
The Glock 17, often simply referred to as the “Glock,” holds a pivotal position in the history of modern handguns. Developed in Austria in the early 1980s by Gaston Glock, it was a revolutionary design at the time, introducing the world to the widespread use of polymer in handgun construction. This innovation, coupled with a simple, reliable design, quickly propelled the Glock 17 to international recognition. The design incorporated a striker-fired system, a relatively simple and robust mechanism, and a distinctive polymer frame. This frame significantly reduced weight compared to traditional all-steel handguns and also offered excellent durability.
The Glock 17 quickly gained popularity among law enforcement agencies and militaries around the globe. Its ruggedness, ease of maintenance, and consistent performance made it a trusted sidearm for those who relied on their firearms in critical situations. Over the decades, the Glock 17 has undergone subtle revisions and improvements, but its core design principles have remained remarkably consistent. Its reputation for reliability is legendary, often cited as one of its most significant advantages. The pistol’s straightforward design contributes to this reputation, as fewer moving parts generally translate to fewer opportunities for malfunctions. Furthermore, the Glock 17 boasts unparalleled aftermarket support. A vast array of accessories, replacement parts, and customization options are readily available, allowing owners to tailor their Glock 17 to their specific needs and preferences. This widespread support makes the Glock 17 a versatile choice for shooters of all skill levels.
The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0: A Modern Contender
Smith & Wesson, a name synonymous with American firearms, entered the polymer-framed, striker-fired handgun market with its original M&P series. While the initial M&P models were met with some mixed reviews, Smith & Wesson continuously refined the design, listening to feedback from users and incorporating improvements. The culmination of these efforts is the M&P 2.0 series, a significant evolution that addressed many of the criticisms leveled against the original design.
The M&P 2.0 features a number of notable upgrades. One of the most significant is the enhanced trigger. Smith & Wesson engineers focused on improving the trigger pull, feel, and reset, aiming for a smoother and more consistent operation. They also significantly improved the frame, enhancing the grip texture and ergonomics. The 2.0 model generally provides a better grip and feels more secure in the hand. Several models of the M&P 2.0 come equipped with interchangeable backstraps, allowing users to customize the grip size and fit. The slide and barrel have also been upgraded, typically featuring improved coatings and finishes that enhance durability and resistance to wear. The M&P 2.0 series also integrated other features, making the handgun more appealing. Overall, the M&P 2.0 is a direct response to the evolving preferences of modern shooters. The gun is meant to meet the needs of those looking for greater comfort, accuracy, and a more user-friendly experience.
A Detailed Look: Specifications and Features Compared
Let’s move beyond the history and general overviews to examine the key specifications and features that distinguish the Glock 17 and the M&P 2.0.
The Glock 17 is typically chambered in 9mm Luger, the most common and widely available handgun cartridge. It holds a standard magazine capacity, which is ample for self-defense or recreational shooting. The M&P 2.0 also primarily comes chambered in 9mm Luger, although other caliber options like .40 S&W and .45 ACP are available in certain M&P 2.0 configurations. Magazine capacity varies slightly depending on the model and caliber but generally offers a similar number of rounds.
In terms of size and dimensions, both handguns fall into the full-size category. The Glock 17, with its longer barrel and slide, offers a good balance between firepower and handling. It’s large enough to provide a comfortable grip and stable platform for accurate shooting, but still reasonably concealable, particularly with a good holster. The M&P 2.0 shares similar dimensions. The differences in overall length and weight between the two are generally minimal, making them both viable choices for concealed carry, though the larger size might require some practice to conceal effectively.
The frame of the Glock 17 is constructed from high-strength polymer. This polymer frame is lightweight, durable, and resistant to corrosion. The Glock’s grip, while simple, offers a functional shape and typically includes a textured surface for a secure hold. The M&P 2.0, as noted previously, has significantly improved its grip texture and offers a more aggressive surface for enhanced control. In addition, the interchangeable backstraps of the M&P 2.0 allow for customization, accommodating different hand sizes and grip preferences. This adaptability is a major selling point for the M&P 2.0.
The trigger is a critical component of any handgun, directly impacting accuracy and control. The Glock 17 has a trigger known for its simplicity and relatively short travel. However, the trigger pull is often described as feeling “mushy” and lacks a crisp break. The M&P 2.0, in contrast, features a significantly improved trigger compared to its predecessors. It generally offers a lighter and crisper pull with a more defined reset, allowing for faster and more accurate follow-up shots.
The sights on the Glock 17 are typically basic, offering a standard three-dot configuration. While functional, they can be less precise than more advanced sight systems. The M&P 2.0 also comes standard with three-dot sights, but the slide is readily compatible with various aftermarket sights. This widespread aftermarket support allows users to upgrade to sights that meet their specific needs, such as night sights or optics-ready configurations.
Slide and barrel construction are crucial for durability and accuracy. The Glock 17 employs a hardened steel slide with a Tenifer finish, known for its resistance to wear and corrosion. The M&P 2.0 also uses a durable steel slide and barrel, often with upgraded coatings. Barrel lengths are very close between the two and the reliability for both handguns is excellent.
Ergonomics and handling play a significant role in how comfortable and effective a handgun is for the shooter. The Glock 17, with its simple, straightforward design, is generally easy to operate and maintain. The grip angle is a matter of personal preference, and some shooters find it fits their hand naturally, while others might need some time to adjust. The M&P 2.0’s improved grip ergonomics and interchangeable backstraps provide a more comfortable and customizable fit for a wider range of hand sizes.
Performance Analysis: Shooting and Reliability in Action
Beyond the specifications, the true test of any handgun is how it performs on the range and in real-world scenarios.
Accuracy is a crucial factor, and both the Glock 17 and the M&P 2.0 are capable of excellent performance in the hands of a competent shooter. The Glock 17’s consistent barrel and slide make it a reliably accurate handgun. The M&P 2.0, with its improved trigger and ergonomics, often allows for even tighter groupings. Factors such as sight picture and trigger control play a significant role in accuracy, and both handguns offer solid platforms to develop those skills.
Recoil management is another essential consideration. The Glock 17 is known for its manageable recoil, making it easy to control during rapid firing sequences. The M&P 2.0, with its improved grip design and slightly heavier frame, also provides excellent recoil control, potentially offering a slightly softer shooting experience than its predecessor. The grip texture and frame design help keep the handgun stable during firing.
Reliability is paramount, and both the Glock 17 and the M&P 2.0 have earned reputations for being dependable. The Glock 17’s simple design and robust construction contribute to its legendary reliability. The M&P 2.0 builds upon the previous M&P models’ solid foundation, and has made improvements which contribute to a reliable function. Proper maintenance and the use of quality ammunition are key to ensuring optimal performance for either handgun.
Accessory and aftermarket support is plentiful for both handguns. The Glock 17 benefits from decades of widespread popularity, offering an almost limitless selection of aftermarket parts, accessories, and customization options. The M&P 2.0 also enjoys substantial aftermarket support, though perhaps not quite as extensive as the Glock. Even so, there is a wide array of holsters, sights, lights, and other upgrades available for the M&P 2.0.
Weighing the Advantages and Disadvantages
The Glock 17’s pros include its legendary reliability, a simple and intuitive design, excellent aftermarket support, and typically a more affordable price point. Its simplicity makes it easy to learn and maintain. However, some shooters may find its trigger less desirable than the M&P 2.0’s improved trigger, and the grip angle may not be ideal for all hand sizes.
The M&P 2.0’s advantages include superior ergonomics, a significantly improved trigger, and customizable grip options. It often feels more natural in the hand, and the enhanced trigger allows for greater precision. A potential disadvantage is the higher price point compared to some Glock 17 configurations.
Cost and Value: A Financial Perspective
The price of a handgun is an important factor for many buyers. The Glock 17, particularly in its base configurations, often has a slightly lower price point than the M&P 2.0. This can make it a more attractive option for those on a budget. However, the overall value proposition also considers other factors, such as features, reliability, and aftermarket support. The M&P 2.0, despite its slightly higher price, offers features that may justify the cost, especially if ergonomics, trigger performance, and grip customization are priorities.
Who is Each Handgun Best Suited For?
The Glock 17 is an excellent choice for law enforcement officers, military personnel, and anyone seeking a reliable, simple, and readily available handgun. Its proven track record and vast aftermarket support make it an appealing option for both experienced shooters and beginners. The simple controls are a definite plus for someone starting out.
The M&P 2.0 is well-suited for shooters who prioritize superior ergonomics, a better trigger feel, and grip customization. Competitive shooters, those who appreciate a more refined shooting experience, and those who prefer a more natural point of aim may find the M&P 2.0 to be the better fit.
Making the Final Decision
The choice between the Glock 17 and the M&P 2.0 isn’t about one being inherently “better” than the other. It is a matter of individual preferences, needs, and priorities. Both are excellent handguns that have earned their place in the firearms world. The Glock 17 offers a proven track record of reliability, simplicity, and a vast ecosystem of aftermarket support. The M&P 2.0, on the other hand, provides enhanced ergonomics, a better trigger, and grip customization, often resulting in a more comfortable and refined shooting experience. Consider what aspects of a handgun are most important to you. Do you prioritize reliability and simplicity above all else? Or do you value a superior trigger and a more customized grip? Visit your local gun store to handle and, if possible, shoot both handguns. This will allow you to experience the feel and performance firsthand. By carefully weighing the pros and cons of each model, you can make an informed decision and choose the handgun that best fits your needs and shooting style.
Final Thoughts
Deciding between the Glock 17 and the M&P 2.0 can be a difficult choice, but it’s a rewarding one. Both of these handguns offer a wealth of performance and dependability. Remember that the ideal handgun is subjective and personal. Consider your needs, budget, and shooting style when making your decision. Take the time to research both models, handle them in person, and if possible, try them out at a shooting range. This hands-on experience will help you make an informed decision and choose the handgun that will serve you best.
Important Safety Note: Always handle firearms responsibly, following all safety guidelines and local regulations. Always make sure the gun is unloaded before handling or disassembling it. Learn the safe gun handling practices. Consider taking a gun safety course from a certified instructor.
